Friday, February 21, 2020

Fighting for His Views Ron Paul 2012 Research Paper

Fighting for His Views Ron Paul 2012 - Research Paper Example Another one furthered that comment by saying: â€Å"There are few people in public life who, through thick and thin, rain or shine, stick to their principles. Ron Paul is one of those few.† (About Ron Paul No pg) Ron Paul has always upheld the constitution and he believes that Americans must face the harsh realities of the world. He believed that we need to tackle our problems using the principles of our forefathers which form the basis on which our great nation was built (Potter No pg). Pittsburgh was the birth place of Ron Paul and he was raised there as well. He grew up to become an obstetrician/gynecologist with more than 4000 deliveries under his belt. Furthermore, Ron married Carol Wells in 1957 and has been with her since. He is fathering five children with her. He has been active in politics for almost 50 years now and his views and ideals have not wavered an inch over these years. He is consistent, trustworthy and real and he is one of the most famous Presidential can didate for the elections of 2012(Potter No pg). Paul believes in the integrity of the Constitution and that is why he so vehemently opposes any act that encroaches on the freedom and privacy of American people. This is a refreshing change of pace for Americans who so far have only witnessed politicians who talk about honoring the constitution but completely ignore it when it does not fit their agenda. Ron Paul may not be as polished as other candidates but he likes to keep it real and this has been the reason for him fame. He says what he really believes in his heart and no amount of motivation can get him to change his beliefs. One of his followers sums it up best when she says: â€Å"What Ron Paul started is not going to go away. Republicans are in the midst of deciding what the GOP really is. He’s the only one standing on principles. And those principles are going to outlive Ron Paul.† (Potter No pg) Ron Paul’s thoughts and beliefs arise from the wide range o f experiences he has had over his long and colorful life. During the 1960’s, he worked for the Air Force of the United States as a Flight Surgeon. During his long and illustrious career as an obstetrician/gynecologist; he never once felt the need to perform an abortion, not even to save a woman’s life. He always found another way. This proved his strong conviction to uphold the sanctity of life. As a President, he will continue to fight for his pro-life beliefs that he has upheld in Congress throughout the years (Ron Paul on the Issues No pg). America is light years behind the rest of the world when it comes to health care. Our bureaucrats continue to force upon us their one-size-fits-all policies that will never lower costs or increase access for the common American. Paul plans on changing all that once he becomes President. According to Paul, the most effective strategy for ensuring better medical care is to ensure an effective doctor-patient relationship. Ron Paul w ill put health care decisions back into the public’s hands. He promises to remove unnecessary legislation, corrupt mandates, and thoughtless incentives and create a system where everyone can get the necessary health care (Ron Paul on the Issues No pg). Ron Paul is just as sick of the rising economic malaise as the rest of Americans. He is against the growing inflation, higher gas prices, huge budget deficits and completely immoral bailouts

Wednesday, February 5, 2020

Liberal Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Liberal - Essay Example In establishing this argument, Mill explains that the contentious issue is the set of people’s actions towards interpersonal relationships and the forces that influences such actions. While liberty is a common element in liberalism and a person can undertake any act in his or her environment, such acts, whether of omission or of commission, must take into account legal, moral or social obligations that an individual owes to other members of the society. The main argument therefore identifies limitations to a person’s liberty as long as such liberty promises threats to other people’s welfare. The argument also justifies the regulations to control an individual’s exercise of personal liberty. It applies the moral utilitarian doctrine of ensuring good as a basis for necessity of such measures against an individual’s liberty (p. 17). The society’s power, whether legal or moral, over a person’s liberty also extend to actions at personal level. Consequently, an individual’s act may not be aimed at the society but liberty over such an act may still be controlled if the society or any other person apart from the individual actor may feel the act’s consequences. The external effect must however be first established before justifying infringement of the actor’s liberty. Similarly, a person may be compelled into an action, against personal will. An example is participation in a judicial process as a witness. Even though the subject is not a party to the case, his or her action has a direct effect on the privity parties to establish ground for infringement of personal liberty. Liberty is therefore a subject of macro environmental forces (p. 17- 19). Even though John’s period is closer to classical liberalism than modern liberalism, he should be classified as a modern liberal. This is primarily because of his ideas that correspond to the features of modern liberalism. His idea on liberty for example identifies a macro